26/365 I like it I like it
363 second exposure at F22, 19 mm with the 16-35 2.8 L and 100 iso
Join 10 other subscribers
Recent Posts
Archives
Blogroll
- A Chef at Large
- Asia Flavours
- BitterSweet
- BONKERS IN HONKERS!
- Cannelle et Vanille
- Cha Xiu Bao
- Chubby Hubby
- Dana McCauley\’s food blog
- Extreme Foods
- F&BImaging
- Food Junkie not Junk Food
- Foodchaser
- Foodies Atelier Blog
- Gregoire Michaud\’s Blog
- Gweipo
- Hong Kong Dog Rescue
- Hong Kong Tech Phooey
- Hongkie Town
- I Heart Film
- Julie Loves Photography
- Junglefrog Cooking
- Mattbites.com
- Michael Loh Photography
- My husband cooks
- my last bite…
- Orangette
- Ordinary Gweilo
- Photoshop on the Fly
- Ritrato
- Ryan Zimmer
- Siu Yeh
- Smog\’s Blog
- Souvlaki for the Soul
- Srobist Blogspot
- Straight from the Farm
- The Amateur Gourmet
- The Onion
- The Wednesday Chef
- What\’s happening at the Studio
- WordPress.com
- WordPress.org
My Fav Links
Recent Comments
 | carlos on Acuatico Resort Philippines |
 | Galen Leeds Photogra… on Romanesco Cauliflower, or… |
 | Mark P on Acuatico Resort Philippines |
 | cosmopolitanblog on 27/365 diffraction |
 | Simone on 27/365 diffraction |
Flickr Photos
- Comment
- Reblog
-
Subscribe
Subscribed
Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
Cosmopolitan's Blog
%d
Question: Why f/22? I like the idea of doing these long exposures at night, haven’t had the chance to try out, always thought the “sweet spot” for the aperture on a lens was somewhere in the middle, not at either end?
February 7, 2011 at 3:08 pm
Hi Steve, f22 because it helps make exposure time longer and it turns all lights into these nice starbursts. One thing if you didn’t buy nd filter yet, do NOT buy this lightcraft vario ND filters they cost a bomb and are crap! Better buy a fixed nd500 instead. Cheers
Marco
February 8, 2011 at 1:57 am